The outer display type affects how the element (which acts as a container) is displayed in its context. ![]() The display CSS property in fact sets two things at once: the outer display type, and the inner display type. Using two-value display syntax instead, for clarity In fact, it is for this reason alone you will almost never use display: inline-flex unless you have a very good reason to display your flex container inline. Chances are what you're looking for is just plain old inline layout ( display: inline and/or display: inline-block), for which flexbox is not a replacement flexbox is not the universal layout solution that everyone claims it is (I'm stating this because the misconception is probably why you're considering flexbox in the first place).ฤก The differences between block layout and inline layout are outside the scope of this question, but the one that stands out the most is auto width: block-level boxes stretch horizontally to fill their containing block, whereas inline-level boxes shrink to fit their contents. It is not clear what exactly you mean by "vertically align" or why exactly you want to display the contents inline, but I suspect that flexbox is not the right tool for whatever you are trying to accomplish. You cannot display flex items inline otherwise you don't actually have a flex layout. In particular, the flex items themselves always behave like block-level boxes (although they do have some properties of inline-blocks). There is absolutely no difference in the effect on flex items flex layout is identical whether the flex container is block-level or inline-level. A similar comparison can be made between display: inline-block and display: block, and pretty much any other display type that has an inline counterpart. ![]() ![]() That is the only difference between display: inline-flex and display: flex. It makes the flex container display inline. Display: inline-flex does not make flex items display inline.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |